ESTATE OF HEINOLD v. C. I. R.

No. 15317.

363 F.2d 329 (1966)

ESTATE of Matthew I. HEINOLD, Deceased, Virgil W. Heinold, Executor, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

June 17, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John L. Carey, Bruce R. Bancroft, South Bend, Ind., Delmar R. Hoeppner, Valparaiso, Ind., Edward J. Gray, South Bend, Ind., for petitioner.

Richard M. Roberts, Asst. Atty. Gen., Herbert Grossman, Atty., Tax Div., Lee A. Jackson, Gilbert E. Andrews, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge and KNOCH and CASTLE, Circuit Judges.


KNOCH, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Estate of Matthew I. Heinold, deceased, Virgil W. Heinold, Executor, seeks review of a decision of the Tax Court of the United States finding a deficiency in estate taxes, with specific reference to two disputed issues decided adversely to the petitioner.

The Tax Court held that the fair market value of 25,000 shares of stock owned by decedent at his death was $8 per share rather than the value of approximately half that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases