STATE v. FORD


242 Or. 449 (1966)

410 P.2d 223

STATE OF OREGON v. FORD

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 26, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William P. Brandsness, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Coe & Brandsness, Klamath Falls.

J.R. Thomas, Deputy District Attorney, Klamath Falls, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Sam A. McKeen, District Attorney, and Harry D. Lewis, Deputy District Attorney, Klamath Falls.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and SCHWAB, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged bank check and appeals.

On appeal, the defendant contends for the first time that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence, without objection, handwriting samples executed by the defendant at the request of a city police officer. The basis of his objection is that the evidence does not show that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases