VANDERLINDE v. WEHLE

No. 39872.

144 N.W.2d 547 (1966)

Andrew VANDERLINDE, Respondent, v. Anthony F. WEHLE, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 29, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Berens, Rodenberg & O'Connor, New Ulm, for appellant.

Nemerov, Perl & Hunegs, Minneapolis, for respondent.


OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

This is a negligence action in which defendant appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or in the alternative for a new trial. The defendant asserts that the verdict is excessive and that prejudicial error occurred during the trial when plaintiff's counsel allegedly suggested to the jury that insurance was involved.

The plaintiff, Andrew Vanderlinde, and the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases