1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 247 Cal.App.2d
  5. 247 Cal.App.2d 436 (1966)
 

SCHONBERG v. PERRY

Docket No. 29788.

247 Cal.App.2d 436 (1966)

55 Cal. Rptr. 579

SAMI SCHONBERG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ANNA PERRY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

December 21, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Barnett Spivak for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ball, Hunt & Hart, Joseph A. Ball and Edgar F. Gross for Defendant and Respondent.

ROTH, P.J.

Sami Schonberg, appellant, a diamond merchant doing business in Antwerp, sued for and recovered from Anna Perry, respondent, a Beverly Hills housewife and his cousin, $35,000. He charged Anna had fraudulently breached a contract involving the purchase of diamonds which she had persuaded him to allow her to negotiate with one Michelangelo Fucile, who was her friend. The contract was made in 1958 in Antwerp or Genoa, or both, and was to be performed in Genoa...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases