WALSER v. VINGE

No. 39503.

146 N.W.2d 537 (1966)

Joseph Warren WALSER, Appellant, v. Lloyd Joseph VINGE, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

October 28, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bentson & Kalina, Lakeville, for appellant.

Murnane, Murnane, Battis & DeLambert, St. Paul, for respondent.


OPINION

MURPHY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial court which granted a new trial on the issue of damages unless defendant should consent to an additur to the jury award. Although the defendant filed consent to the additur, plaintiff regarded the award as still inadequate and has appealed. Thereafter, defendant filed a notice of review pursuant to Minn.St. 605.065.1

Plaintiff, Joseph Warren Walser...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases