1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 585 (1966)
 

CAMPARO v. WOODBRIDGE TP.

91 N.J. Super. 585 (1966)

222 A.2d 28

ANTHONY L. CAMPARO AND JOSEPHINE CAMPARO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE, ETC., AND THEODORE MEHALOFF, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 7, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Warren Brody argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Winetsky & Brody, attorneys).

Mr. Paul E. Anderson argued the cause for defendant Theodore Mehaloff (Mr. Guido J. Brigiani, attorney).

Mr. Norman Robbins argued the cause for defendant township.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs appeal from a partial summary judgment holding that a building permit is valid.

The undisputed facts are: Defendant Mehaloff is the owner of property with a frontage of approximately 65 feet on Route 1 in Woodbridge, which is rented to Spotless Venetian Blind Service & Mfg. Co. (Spotless), of which he is a principal. The business of Spotless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases