1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 244 Or.
  5. 244 Or. 428 (1966)
 

HAGGERTY v. NOBLES

244 Or. 428 (1966)

419 P.2d 9

HAGGERTY ET AL v. NOBLES ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed and remanded October 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl G. Helm, La Grande, for appellants.

Robert V. Chrisman, Enterprise, and Kottkamp & O'Rourke, Pendleton, for respondents.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED AND REMANDED.

LUSK, J.

This is a suit for partition of farmland in Wallowa County and for an accounting as incidental thereto. The court, being of the opinion that the property could not be partitioned "without great prejudice to the owners," ORS 105.245, ordered its sale. The defendants Nobles have appealed from the interlocutory decree. They contend that there should be partition in kind and further challenge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases