1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 638 (1966)
 

O'CONNOR OIL CORP. v. WARBER

30 Wis.2d 638 (1966)

O'CONNOR OIL CORPORATION, Appellant, v. WARBER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 10, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by McLeod, Donohue & Colwin of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by Raymond R. Colwin.

For the respondent there was a brief by Worthing, Schneider & Mickiewicz of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by John W. Mickiewicz.

BEILFUSS, J.

The issues are: (1) Was parol evidence admissible to vary or explain the terms of the written note, and (2) are the findings of the trial court against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.

The first issue must be resolved against the plaintiff-appellant, O'Connor.

The obligation of Warber was to pay the $1,200 "on demand when sales agreements are terminated." The written terms of the note, without explanation, do not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases