1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 437 P.2d
  5. 437 P.2d 229 (1966)
 

ISAACS v. OKLAHOMA CITY

Nos. 41276, 41527.

437 P.2d 229 (1966)

Roy ISAACS for himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiff in Error, v. OKLAHOMA CITY, a Municipal Corporation, Urban Renewal Authority, Granville Tomerlin, Chairman, F.D. Moon, Vice-Chairman, C. Kenneth Woodard, Secretary, Reuben G. Martin, Member, Ralph L. Boien, Member, James T. Yeilding, Executive Director, Defendants in Error. S.M. ROOF, Loal C. Wilson and J.V. Garrett, Plaintiffs in Error, v. TULSA URBAN RENEWAL AUTHORITY, a purported public body corporate, of Tulsa, Oklahoma, and its Officers and Members, Leeman Nix, Chairman, Robert Laird, Vice-Chairman, Murray McCune, Member, Paul Chapman, Executive Director and Secretary, and the City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, a Municipal Corporation, Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearings Denied March 21, 1967.

Second Rehearing Denied April 17, 1967.

Certiorari Denied October 9, 1967.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sid White, Oklahoma City, and Ted R. Fisher, of Johnson & Fisher, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

Roy H. Semtner, Horace Thompson, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error City of Oklahoma City.

V.P. Crowe and Paul R. McDaniel, of Crowe, Boxley, Dunlevy, Thweatt, Swinford & Johnson, and Coleman Hayes and Russell F. Thompson, of Monnet, Hayes, Bullis, Grubb & Thompson, and J. Dan Batchelor, Oklahoma City, for defendant in error, Urban Renewal Authority.

Smith & Brown, and Chas. E. Norman, by Finis Smith, Tulsa, for defendants in error, Tulsa Urban Renewal Authority.

T. Murray Robinson and Wm. N. Christian, of Robinson, Robertson & Barnes, Oklahoma City, for S.D. Rorem, amici curiae.

Certiorari Denied October 9, 1967. See 88 S.Ct. 63.

HALLEY, Chief Justice.

There are two cases involved here, which because of the similarity of issues, have, by our order of November 10, 1966, been consolidated for decision.

The first case is an appeal from the judgment of the District Court of Oklahoma County in sustaining a demurrer to the petition of Roy Isaacs, plaintiff in error here, who, for himself...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases