1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 27 A.D.2d
  5. 27 A.D.2d 629 (1966)
 

WRONOWSKI v. MID-CITY SHOPPING CTR., INC.

27 A.D.2d 629 (1966)

Nancy Wronowski, Respondent-Appellant, v. Mid-City Shopping Center, Inc., Appellant, et al., Defendant. (Action No. 1.) Nancy Wronowski, Appellant, v. Harold Jarvis, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (Action No. 2.) Mid-City Shopping Center, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Topp's Discount City, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 3.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

December 30, 1966

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Absent any exception to the charge or any pertinent request to charge, appellant's counsel having indeed affirmatively approved the charge, we find no basis for disturbing the judgment entered upon the verdict of no cause of action in favor of the third-party defendant. The indefensible conduct of plaintiff's attorney, in large part evoked by the actions of appellant's attorney, is not to be condoned, but we find that no substantial prejudice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases