1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 245 Cal.App.2d
  5. 245 Cal.App.2d 409 (1966)
 

MORRIS STULSAFT FOUNDATION v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 23680.

245 Cal.App.2d 409 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 12

THE MORRIS STULSAFT FOUNDATION et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondent; LILLIAN K. STULSAFT et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

October 6, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cooley, Crowley, Gaither, Godward, Castro & Huddleson and Harley J. Spitler for Petitioners.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Eric Collins, Deputy Attorney General, as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Vincent Hallinan for Real Parties in Interest.

SULLIVAN, P.J.

Petitioners seek a writ of mandate commanding respondent court to vacate its order denying their motion to compel a witness to answer questions propounded at a deposition upon oral examination and further commanding respondent to enter an order compelling the witness to answer.1

[1a, 2a] Petitioners are contestants in a will contest pending in the lower court in the Matter of the Estate of Morris Stulsaft...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases