1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 223 A.2d
  5. 223 A.2d 423 (1966)
 

NORTHEAST SHOE CO. v. INDUSTRIAL & REC. FIN. APP. BD.

223 A.2d 423 (1966)

NORTHEAST SHOE CO., Inc. v. The INDUSTRIAL AND RECREATIONAL FINANCE APPROVAL BOARD and Frank G. Chapman.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

October 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rudman, Rudman & Carter, by Paul L. Rudman, Bangor, for plaintiff.

Leon V. Walker, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Augusta, for defendants.

Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, MARDEN and DUFRESNE, JJ.

WILLIAMSON, Chief Justice.

On report. This is a complaint for a declaratory judgment and relief in the nature of mandamus by the Northeast Shoe Co., Inc., the plaintiff, against the Industrial and Recreational Finance Approval Board [the Board], a public instrumentality established under Section 5327 of the "Municipal Industrial and Recreational Obligations Act" (the Act), and Frank G. Chapman, its acting manager. Rule 57...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases