1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 242 Or.
  5. 242 Or. 397 (1966)
 

DIAMOND FRUIT GROWERS, INC. v. GOE CO.

242 Or. 397 (1966)

409 P.2d 909

DIAMOND FRUIT GROWERS, INC. v. GOE CO. ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas A. Wilson, Yakima, Washington, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Parker & Abraham, Hood River.

Edwin J. Peterson, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Wayne C. Annala, Hood River, and Tooze, Powers, Kerr, Tooze & Peterson, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, LUSK and SCHWAB, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

The plaintiff Diamond Fruit Growers, a cooperative association, brought this suit against the defendants to have a standard cooperative growers contract entered into with Goe Brothers, a partnership consisting of Joe, Merle and Donald Goe, specifically enforced.

The trial court entered its decree enforcing the provisions of the contract, and the defendants appeal.

The record discloses that the partnership was the owner of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases