1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 91 N.J.
  5. 91 N.J. Super. 546 (1966)
 

MAGASINY ONIC DEVICES, INC. v. PRECISION SPECIALTIES, INC.

91 N.J. Super. 546 (1966)

221 A.2d 755

IRVING P. MAGASINY AND ONIC DEVICES, INC., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. PRECISION SPECIALTIES, INC., JOHN S. BAER AND RAYMOND F. KOEHLER, JOINTLY, SEVERALLY, AND/OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur E. Ballen argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. James Hunter, III, argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys).

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

PER CURIAM.

Summary judgment was granted in favor of defendants on the ground that the contract sued upon was unenforcible because plaintiffs had not procured a professional engineering license pursuant to N.J.S.A. 45:8-27. We reverse because the record does not "show palpably that there is no issue as to any material fact challenged and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment * * * as a matter of law." Therefore summary judgment should not have been...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases