ROEDER v. MILLER

No. 21271.

412 P.2d 219 (1966)

Carl A. ROEDER, Plaintiff in Error, v. Martin P. MILLER, District Attorney In and For the Eighteenth Judicial District, State of Colorado, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

March 21, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Christiansen, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Martin P. Miller, pro se, Harry E. Carleno, Englewood, for defendant in error.


SUTTON, Chief Justice.

We shall refer to Carl A. Roeder, who was defendant in the trial court either by name or as the defendant, and to the defendant in error Miller as the District Attorney.

The issue presented for our determination is whether the Arapahoe County Zoning Resolution was so arbitrary and unreasonable, when applied to Roeder, as to render it unconstitutional in its application.

The basic facts are not in dispute. On August 11, 1956,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases