Appellant did not controvert the original claim, which was filed in 1960, and does not dispute its responsibility for the basic sensitization at least, but does contend that "claimant had fifteen employments in which he was exposed to agents which would have sensitized or aggravated his dermatitis condition * * * and that if the employer is called upon to pay anything it should not be more than its proportionate share." The board's refusal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
