NEENAH v. ALSTEEN


30 Wis.2d 596 (1966)

CITY OF NEENAH, Respondent, v. ALSTEEN, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 10, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Van Susteren, Bollenbeck, Patterson, Froehlich & Jensen and Edward R. Bollenbeck, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Edward R. Bollenbeck.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Charles E. Schaller, city attorney.


HEFFERNAN, J.

The defendant sought the adverse examination of the plaintiff's police officers under the provisions of sec. 326.12, Stats.1

This statute provides that the right of adverse examination shall be available "in any civil action."

The trial judge, however, took the position that the particular violation was unlike the ordinary civil action in that it partook of many of the characteristics of a criminal action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases