1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 32 Wis.2d
  5. 32 Wis.2d 593 (1966)
 

BAIERL v. HINSHAW

32 Wis.2d 593 (1966)

BAIERL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HINSHAW and another, Defendants and Respondents: HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Impleaded Defendant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 29, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs by Cohen, Parins, Cohen & Grant of Green Bay, and oral argument by Robert J. Parins.

For the respondents there was a brief by Bradford & Gabert of Appleton, and oral argument by Stanley Gabert.

CURRIE, C. J.

While the brief of plaintiff-appellant raises 11 assignments of error, this opinion will be limited to consideration of the following three issues:

(1) Was the form of verdict a proper manner in which to submit the negligence issues to the jury?

(2) Should a new trial be directed, either on the ground of error or in the interest of justice, because of the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury with respect to the alleged failure...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases