The defendant raises many issues on this appeal, but it appears that there was strong proof of his guilt, both by positive identification and strong circumstantial evidence. The defendant contends that a certain wallet should not have been admitted in evidence, but no motion was made to suppress this evidence, either before or at the trial, nor did the defendant raise any objection to its receipt in evidence (People v. Weems,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. EDMONDS
26 A.D.2d 592 (1966)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert Edmonds, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 3, 1966
June 3, 1966
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
