STATE v. ROSENBURGER


242 Or. 376 (1966)

409 P.2d 684

STATE OF OREGON v. ROSENBURGER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 12, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent G. Robeson, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

George M. Joseph, Deputy District Attorney, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were George Van Hoomissen, District Attorney, and Carr M. King, Deputy District Attorney, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving and concealing stolen property, and appeals.

The defendant's claim of error is based upon the trial court's admission into evidence of oral statements made by defendant to officer Percell, which amounted to a confession. These statements were made after defendant had been charged with the crime and was in custody.

Before permitting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases