PEOPLE v. WEEMS


17 N.Y.2d 598 (1966)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Weems, Jr., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided February 24, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis L. Hoynes, Jr., Anthony F. Marra and Kenneth L. Beaugrand for appellant.

Aaron E. Koota, District Attorney (Stanley M. Meyer of counsel), for respondent.

Concur: Chief Judge DESMOND and Judges FULD, VAN VOORHIS, BURKE, BERGAN and KEATING. Judge SCILEPPI dissents and votes to affirm the conviction on all counts, being of the opinion that the record contains the corroboration required by section 2013 of the Penal Law.


Judgment modified by reversing the convictions for assault second degree and by dismissing those two counts of the indictment upon the ground that (as conceded by the prosecution) this record does not contain the corroboration required by section 2013 of the Penal Law, and, as so modified, affirmed. We do not reach the question of the legality of the seizure of the clothing since defendant did not comply with sections 813-c and 813-d of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases