KEMP v. BEASLEY

No. 1740.

188 So.2d 425 (1966)

O. C. KEMP, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. G. A. BEASLEY, Defendant and Appellee.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

July 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Johnson, Morelock, Gatti, Egan & Cook, by Max M. Morelock, Shreveport, for plaintiff-appellant.

Thomas A. Self, Many, W. Douglas Weisbruch, Houston, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before FRUGE, HOOD and CULPEPPER, JJ.


CULPEPPER, Judge.

The plaintiff, O. C. Kemp, seeks to reform an instrument whereby he acquired certain mineral interests from the defendant, G. A. Beasley. The alleged basis for the suit is that due to a "typographical error" the instrument does not reflect the true intention of the parties. From an adverse judgment plaintiff appealed.

The substantial issue is factual, i. e., whether plaintiff has sustained the burden of proof required in cases of this type...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases