GROSS v. DUNHAM


91 N.J. Super. 519 (1966)

221 A.2d 555

CAROL GROSS, BY HER GUARDIAN AD LITEM, DOLORES GROSS, AND DOLORES GROSS, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. FRANK DUNHAM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 30, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edmond J. Canzona argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair and Warren, attorneys).

Mr. Hugh Porter argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.


PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in favor of defendant following a jury verdict of no cause for action, and denial of plaintiffs' motion for a new trial. The action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the infant plaintiff, Carol Gross, as a result of being attacked by defendant's dog. Her mother, Dolores Gross, sued per quod.

On May 4, 1963 the infant plaintiff was walking her dog on a public street...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases