1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 30 Wis.2d
  5. 30 Wis.2d 580 (1966)
 

STATE v. KOPACKA

30 Wis.2d 580 (1966)

STATE, Respondent, v. KOPACKA, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 12, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by David L. Walther of Milwaukee.

For the respondent the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

GORDON, J.

The trial court refused to entertain Mr. Kopacka's application for a writ of coram nobis and based that refusl upon our decision in Houston v. State (1959), 7 Wis.2d 348, 96 N.W.2d 343. Unless this court is willing to retreat from its holding in Houston, the trial court must be affirmed. In Houston, this court stated, at page 352:

". . ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases