ALFINITO v. SATER

Docket No. 22587.

246 Cal.App.2d 362 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 636

RUDOLPH ALFINITO et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MAURY S. SATER et al., Defendants and Appellants. HARRY GOLDHAMMER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. MAURY S. SATER et al., Defendants and Appellants. (Consolidated Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

November 14, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eisner & Titchell, Richard D. Maltzman, Haskell Titchell, Norman A. Eisner, Baum & Aran, and Robert M. Aran for Defendants and Appellants.

Crist, Peters, Donegan & Brenner, John M. Brenner and Elster S. Haile for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


SIMS, J.

Defendants have appealed from adverse judgments in separate actions, consolidated for trial, in which plaintiffs were granted decrees of specific performance of an alleged obligation to convey interests in land to the respective plaintiffs.

The controversy revolves around the interpretation of a certain agreement of joint venture which was executed by all of the parties. The basic questions are: (1) were the plaintiffs' rights to purchase an interest...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases