COM. v. BONAPARTE


208 Pa.Super. 397 (1966)

Commonwealth v. Bonaparte, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

September 15, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jan M. Wiley, with him Griest & Wiley, for appellant.

John T. Miller, First Assistant District Attorney, with him John F. Rauhauser, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, JACOBS, HOFFMAN, and SPAULDING, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, September 15, 1966:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

I dissent for two reasons:

I

The Commonwealth, over objection, introduced into evidence a statement given by appellant when first taken into police custody. In this statement appellant purportedly denied any knowledge of the burglary and declared that he had received the stolen wigs from a boy in Harrisburg.

The only warning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases