1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 243 Or.
  5. 243 Or. 359 (1966)
 

BETKER v. OPPEL

243 Or. 359 (1966)

413 P.2d 426

BETKER ET UX v. OPPEL ET UX

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed April 20, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clifford E. Nelson, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. On the briefs were Phelps, Nelson & Shepherd, Portland.

William K. Shepherd, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was G. Bernhard Fedde, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and GOODWIN, DENECKE, HOLMAN and LUSK, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

GOODWIN, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment denying relief for the reason that the issue was res judicata.

The action was for the return of money paid by the plaintiffs and their assignors toward the purchase of certain described real property sold under a contract. The vendors, as defendants, filed an answer alleging in substance that the relief sought by the amended complaint had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases