Per Curiam.
We find no substance to the sole contention raised in respect of the merits, whereby appellant urges that the copy of the bond in evidence was incomplete, in that a copy of the construction contract was not annexed to it; this despite defendant's specific admission to the contrary contained in its answer and made at a time when any omission, technical or otherwise, could have been readily supplied upon pretrial examination of defendant which wrote...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
