1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 4 Ariz.
  5. 4 Ariz. App. 55 (1966)
 

BADE v. DRACHMAN

No. 2 CA-CIV 260.

4 Ariz. App. 55 (1966)

417 P.2d 689

A.E. BADE, Pima County Assessor, Thomas Jay, Dennis Weaver and Peter Rubi, as members of and constituting the Board of Equalization and the Board of Supervisors of Pima County, Arizona, Carroll H. Christian, Pima County Treasurer, and William Stanford, Warren Peterson and Thad Moore, as members of and constituting the State Board of Equalization of Arizona, Appellants, v. Richard M. DRACHMAN, Fanchon Drachman and Campbell Plaza Co., a limited partnership, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona.

Supplemental Opinion on Denial of Rehearing September 13, 1966.

Review Denied September 30, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William J. Schafer, III, Pima County Atty., Rose Silver, Chief Civil Deputy County Atty. for Pima County, Manuel Avalos, Deputy County Atty. for Pima County, Tucson, for appellants Bade and Christian.

Robert N. Hillock, Sp. Deputy County Atty., for Pima County, Tucson, for appellants Jay, Weaver and Rubi.

Darrell F. Smith, Atty. Gen., James D. Winter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellant, State Bd. of Equalization.

Boyle, Bilby, Thompson & Shoenhair, by Marvin S. Cohen, Tucson, for appellees.

Robert Corbin, Maricopa County Atty., Olgerd W. Kalyna, Sp. Deputy County Atty. for Maricopa County, Henry J. Florence, Deputy County Atty. for Maricopa County, Phoenix, for Maricopa County, as amicus curiae.

MOLLOY, Judge.

This appeal is taken from a judgment in the Superior Court of Pima County in favor of appellees (plaintiffs below) against appellants (defendants below). We shall refer to the parties as they appeared in the lower court. The factual posture of the case, as to which there is no dispute, is as follows.

Plaintiffs Drachman are the owners of commercial real property and the improvements thereon and plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases