COMMONWEALTH v. COPELAND


207 Pa.Super. 386 (1966)

Commonwealth v. Copeland, Appellant.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

March 24, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward Copeland, appellant, in propria persona.

William G. Klenk, II, and Joseph M. Smith, Assistant District Attorneys, F. Emmett Fitzpatrick, Jr., First Assistant District Attorney, and James C. Crumlish, Jr., District Attorney, for Commonwealth, appellee.

Before ERVIN, P.J., WRIGHT, WATKINS, MONTGOMERY, FLOOD, JACOBS, and HOFFMAN, JJ.


OPINION PER CURIAM, March 24, 1966:

Judgment of sentence affirmed.

DISSENTING OPINION BY HOFFMAN, J.:

This is an appeal by a defendant who was convicted of the illegal sale and possession of narcotics. Appellant is not represented by counsel in this appeal.

The Commonwealth's brief states that originally, "By letter appellant sought to `appeal' and requested the notes of testimony. [The trial judge] treated the `appeal' as a motion for new...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases