PEOPLE EX REL. CITY, BELLFLOWER v. BELLFLOWER CTY.

Docket No. 30409.

247 Cal.App.2d 344 (1966)

55 Cal. Rptr. 584

THE PEOPLE ex rel. CITY OF BELLFLOWER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. BELLFLOWER COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

December 20, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, Sanford N. Gruskin, Deputy Attorney General, Alexander Googooian, City Attorney, and Ralph B. Helm for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Burris & Lagerlof and Cecil E. Clough for Defendant and Respondent.


LILLIE, J.

It being contended that defendant water district, upon the inclusion of its entire area within the corporate limits of relator city, became merged by operation of law with that municipality, the existence of defendant was challenged by this quo warranto proceeding. After a trial, mostly on questions of law, judgment was rendered for defendant from which the People appeal.

The complaint alleged, and the answer admitted, that Bellflower became an...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases