MTR. OF FOREKAP ASSOC. v. BERMAN


51 Misc.2d 533 (1966)

In the Matter of Forekap Associates, Petitioner, v. Frederick S. Berman, as City Rent and Rehabilitation Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

August 9, 1966


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur T. Kaplan for petitioner. Maurice A. Reichman and Harry Michelson for respondent.


IRVING H. SAYPOL, J.

The petitioner-landlord in this proceeding (CPLR, art. 78) challenges the validity of a regulatory Administrator's Interpretation No. 9, which provides for a fixed rent increase generally for normal replacements of plumbing, but also provides for increases upon preliminary request for an opinion on the ground that the normal allowances are inadequate.

Petitioner attacks the $2 per...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases