1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 369 F.2d
  5. 369 F.2d 215 (1966)
 

KATZ v. LADD

No. 19740.

369 F.2d 215 (1966)

Solomon KATZ et al., Appellants, v. David L. LADD, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided October 13, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Max R. Millman, Philadelphia, Pa., with whom Messrs. Morton C. Jacobs, Philadelphia, Pa., and Milton Osheroff, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D. C., Atty., U. S. Patent Office, with whom Mr. Joseph Schimmel, Acting Sol., U. S. Patent Office, was on the brief, for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, Senior Circuit Judge, and DANAHER and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Patent Office tribunals and the District Court after trial refused to allow the appellants' claims on the ground that they failed to define patentable invention over the prior art. We have carefully examined the entire record and have studied the transcript of the evidence offered at trial. We have concluded that the findings of the District Judge have not been shown to be clearly erroneous and that there was no error in the dismissal of the appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases