1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 242 Md.
  5. 242 Md. 341 (1966)
 

STANKOVICH v. VANNOY

[No. 272, September Term, 1965.]

242 Md. 341 (1966)

219 A.2d 27

STANKOVICH ET UX. v. VANNOY ET UX.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided April 27, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Herndon, Jr., with whom was Gordon C. Murray on the brief, for the appellants.

A. Frederick Taylor, with whom were Martin & Taylor on the brief, for the appellees.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HAMMOND, MARBURY and McWILLIAMS, JJ., and CARTER, J., Chief Judge of the Second Judicial Circuit, specially assigned.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

Both appellants (Stankovich and wife) and appellees (the Vannoys) were victims of the blandishments of Andre H. Carrigan, a real estate promoter who was long on promises but short on fulfillment. A proper understanding of their troubles requires the narration of most of what has happened, despite the fact that we have already dealt with one rather narrow aspect of the controversy. See Stankovich v. Lehman,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases