CHRISLAW v. CLINTON


29 Wis.2d 549 (1966)

CHRISLAW and others, Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF CLINTON, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Wickhem, Consigny & Sedor of Janesville, and oral argument by Gilbert D. Sedor.

For the respondent there was a brief by Geffs, Geffs, Block & Geffs of Janesville, and oral argument by Jacob Geffs.


WILKIE, J.

Two issues are presented on this appeal:

First, did respondent acquire a right-of-way to discharge effluent over appellants' land and, if so, what is the extent of that right-of-way?

Second, did the flow of effluent constitute a nuisance?

Right-of-Way.

The trial court determined that respondent has acquired "use of the surface drain as well as the underground tile drain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases