1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 239 Cal.App.2d
  5. 239 Cal.App.2d 338 (1966)
 

LINDER v. VOGUE INVESTMENTS, INC.

Docket Nos. 28100, 28237.

239 Cal.App.2d 338 (1966)

48 Cal. Rptr. 633

E. JOSEPH LINDER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. VOGUE INVESTMENTS, INC., Intervener and Appellant. (Two Cases.)

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

January 13, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Millen & Gerstenfeld and Gerald Gerstenfeld for Intervener and Appellant.

Brock & Shapero, Edwin S. Saul and Martin M. Shapero for Plaintiff and Respondent.

KAUS, J.

Frustrated in several attempts to intervene in an action between E. Joseph Linder, as plaintiff, and Crescent Homes, as defendant, Vogue Investments Inc., the purported intervener, has filed two appeals, which were consolidated by order of this court.

On June 11, 1963, plaintiff filed his first amended complaint against Crescent Homes, designated as a limited partnership, for money loaned in the sum of $29,940. The complaint alleged that one Jack...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases