LITOFF v. RUTEL


25 A.D.2d 551 (1966)

George Litoff et al., Respondents, v. Ann Rutel et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 21, 1966


Order of the Appellate Term reversed, without costs, and order of the Civil Court affirmed, without costs.

In our opinion, the Civil Court of the City of New York is empowered to grant an application for leave to serve a jury demand nunc pro tunc (CPLR 4102; CCA, § 2102; New York Investors v. Laurelton Homes, 230 App. Div. 712). The amendment to subdivision (b) of section 1303 of the New York City Civil Court Act (L. 1963, ch. 567) did not remove...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases