HO-HO-KUS v. MENDUNO


91 N.J. Super. 482 (1966)

221 A.2d 228

BOROUGH OF HO-HO-KUS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. WILLIAM MENDUNO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 17, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel M. Lyon, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Joseph M. Lynch, of counsel and on the brief).

Mr. Daniel Amster argued the cause for respondent.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.


GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

After a full hearing on charges, the mayor and council of plaintiff borough found defendant guilty of immorality, indecency and lewdness, and also of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, under the applicable sections of the local ordinance establishing and regulating the borough's police department. Accordingly, it terminated his employment as patrolman, effective as of the date the charges were brought. He took an appeal to the County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases