FISH v. REGENTS OF UNIV. OF CAL.

Docket No. 22840.

246 Cal.App.2d 327 (1966)

54 Cal. Rptr. 656

HARRY FISH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 10, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hersh & Hadfield, Leo Fried and Gerald E. Ambinder for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, Agnes O'Brien Smith, Deputy City Attorney, Bledsoe, Smith, Cathcart, Johnson & Rogers and Robert A. Seligson for Defendants and Respondents.


DEVINE, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit. His action is (1) against the City and County of San Francisco and the Regents of the University of California for alleged malicious prosecution because of a recommendation of Dr. Carden that a petition for his commitment as a mentally ill person be filed; (2) against the City and County of San Francisco for false imprisonment because of the action of Dr. Dean in causing him to be detained temporarily for investigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases