RICH v. REISINI


25 A.D.2d 32 (1966)

Valerie I. Rich, Respondent, v. Nicolas Reisini et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants Nicolas Reisini et al., Respondents, v. Cinerama, Inc., Respondent, et al., Defendants Robert Ventura, as Administrator of The Estate of Julia Ventura, Deceased, Appellant, v. Nicolas Reisini et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants Beatrice Hershman, Plaintiff, v. Nicolas Reisini et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 20, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Ross of counsel (Benedict Wolf with him on the brief; Wolf Popper Ross Wolf & Jones, attorneys), for appellant.

Abraham L. Pomerantz of counsel (William E. Haudek and Richard M. Meyer with him on the brief; Pomerantz Levy Haudek & Block, attorneys; Bennett Frankel, attorney), for Valerie I. Rich, respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL, VALENTE and EAGER, JJ., concur.


STEUER, J.

The instant appeal presents a single but delicate question. Four derivative stockholders' actions against officers and directors of Cinerama Corporation and others have been consolidated, and all parties are in accord that consolidation was proper practice. Furthermore, there is no dispute that orderly and economical prosecution of the action necessitates the designation of a general counsel to conduct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases