WHITEHALL LEATHER CO. v. CAPEK

Docket No. 949.

4 Mich. App. 52 (1966)

143 N.W.2d 779

WHITEHALL LEATHER COMPANY v. CAPEK.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided July 26, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hathaway, Latimer, Clink & Robb (H. Winston Hathaway and Fred C. Culver, Jr., of counsel), for plaintiff.

A. Winton Dahlstrom, for defendants.


BURNS, J.

Appellant filed its complaint to establish a prescriptive easement. The trial court denied the request and dismissed the complaint.

The appellant owns and operates a tannery in the city of Whitehall that has been in operation since before the turn of the century. North of, and adjacent to, appellant's tannery is the appellees' vacant property through which runs a spur railroad track connecting the tannery with a main line of the Chesapeake &...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases