1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 254 F.Supp.
  5. 254 F.Supp. 306 (1966)
 

AKRON & BARBERTON BELT R. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF R. TRAIN.

Civ. A. No. 142-66.

254 F.Supp. 306 (1966)

The AKRON & BARBERTON BELT RAILROAD CO. et al., Plaintiffs, v. The BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN et al., Defendants.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

May 19, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway and Ralph J. Moore, Jr., Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.

Milton Kramer, Washington, D. C., for defendants.

OPINION

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

The present motion is, in effect, an application at the foot of the decree. In the opinion of the Court the relief which the Court will grant may be properly awarded at the foot of the decree, even though the motion itself possibly as originally framed, seeks relief beyond such a scope. The relief requested is in the form of a declaratory adjudication or judgment. The Court is of the opinion that there is a justiciable controversy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases