1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 92 N.J.
  5. 92 N.J. Super. 466 (1966)
 

BROTHERHOOD, R.R. TRAINMEN v. CENTRAL R.R., N.J.

92 N.J. Super. 466 (1966)

224 A.2d 28

BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN, BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, AND BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE FIREMEN AND ENGINEMEN, APPELLANTS, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A CORPORATION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. BOROUGH OF KEANSBURG, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. MUNICIPAL PUBLIC SERVICE COORDINATING COMMITTEE, AN ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ETC., APPELLANT, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, A BODY CORPORATE, ET AL., RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 17, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James M. Davis, Jr. argued the cause for appellants Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen (Messrs. Powell & Davis, attorneys).

Mr. Patrick J. McGann, Jr. argued the cause for appellant Borough of Keansburg (Messrs. Reussille, Cornwell, Mausner, Carotenuto & McGann, attorneys; Mr. Milton A. Mausner, on the brief).

Mr. Stephen B. Wiley argued the cause for respondent Central Railroad Company of New Jersey (Messrs. Meyner & Wiley, attorneys; Mr. G. Douglas Hofe, Jr. and Mr. Dominick R. Vetri, on the brief).

Mr. David A. Biederman, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey State Highway Department (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, KILKENNY and COLLESTER.

PER CURIAM.

These are appeals by the railroad brotherhoods, the Borough of Keansburg and the Municipal Public Service Coordinating Committee from a decision of the Deputy Highway Commissioner, granting the petition of Central Railroad Company of New Jersey (hereinafter "Central") to discontinue passenger service on that part of its line known as the Seashore Branch and to make certain schedule revisions, which would eliminate two weekday trains between Atlantic Highlands...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases