FROEMBLING v. GLADDEN


244 Or. 314 (1966)

417 P.2d 1020

FROEMBLING v. GLADDEN

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 9, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence A. Aschenbrenner, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant.

David H. Blunt, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Cecil H. Quesseth, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN, DENECKE and HOLMAN, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks relief under the Post-Conviction Act. He appeals from a judgment in the form of an order allowing defendant's motion to quash the petition and dismissing petitioner's cause of action with prejudice.

The post-conviction proceeding in this case is the epilogue to State v. Froembling, 237 Or. 616, 391 P.2d 390 (1964), cert. den. 379 U.S. 937...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases