1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 32 Wis.2d
  5. 32 Wis.2d 516 (1966)
 

WOLKE v. RUDD

32 Wis.2d 516 (1966)

WOLKE, Sheriff, Plaintiff in error, v. RUDD, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 1, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error the cause was argued by Robert E. Sutton, assistant district attorney of Milwaukee county, with whom on the brief were Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and Hugh R. O'Connell, district attorney.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by James M. Shellow and Shellow, Shellow & Coffey, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by James M. Shellow.

HEFFERNAN, J.

A cursory glance at the record indicates considerable delay in bringing the prisoner to the stage of preliminary examination. After twenty-seven days of incarceration, he still had not been brought before a magistrate for that purpose—this despite the admonitions of sec. 954.08, Stats., that it shall be held "as soon as may be" and the limitation of sec. 954.05 that the hearing cannot be adjourned for more than ten days at any one time without...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases