IN RE CERTAIN CARRIERS REP. BY E., W. & S. CAR. CONF. COM.

Misc. No. 41-63.

255 F.Supp. 290 (1966)

In re CERTAIN CARRIERS REPRESENTED BY the EASTERN, WESTERN AND SOUTHEASTERN CARRIERS' CONFERENCE COMMITTEES, and Certain of Their Employees Represented by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen, Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen, Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, and the Switchmen's Union of North America.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

June 2, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis M. Shea and Richard T. Conway, Washington, D. C., for carriers.

Milton Kramer, Washington, D. C., and Russell B. Day, Cleveland, Ohio, for Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen.


OPINION

HOLTZOFF, District Judge.

By its decision of March 28, 1966, this Court ruled on a motion made by the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen that locomotive firemen who had claims for loss of wages or other forms of remuneration caused by failure to employ them on certain days because of violations of Arbitration Award 282, had a choice of remedies, either an administrative remedy prescribed by a collective bargaining agreement or by a judicial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases