1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 69 Wn.2d
  5. 69 Wn.2d 472 (1966)
 

NO. PAC. TRANSP. CO. v. WA. U. & T. COMM.

No. 37771.

69 Wn.2d 472 (1966)

418 P.2d 735

NORTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORT COMPANY, Respondent, v. WASHINGTON UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

October 6, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Attorney General and Robert E. Simpson, Assistant, for appellant Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission.

George H. Hart (William B. Adams, of counsel), for appellants Black Ball Freight Service et al.

Reaugh, Hart & Allison, George H. Hart, and William Q. Marshall, for appellants Poulsbo-Seattle Auto Freight, Inc., et al.

Dean H. Eastman and Roger J. Crosby, for respondent.

FINLEY, J.

The proper scope of judicial review and control of administrative action virtually defies precise articulation.1 The modern complexity of human affairs and the correlative necessity and complexity of government regulation have precipitated what amounts to an "administrative law explosion." This appeal from a trial court's reversal of a state administrative body's order typifies the kinds of problems raised by administrative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases