1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 241 Md.
  5. 241 Md. 294 (1966)
 

UNSATISFIED FUND BOARD v. HOLLAND

[No. 79, September Term, 1965.]

241 Md. 294 (1966)

216 A.2d 525

UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD v. HOLLAND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided February 4, 1966.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James M. Gabler, with whom were Paul E. Burke, Jr., and Smith, Somerville & Case on the brief, for the appellant.

No brief and no appearance for the appellee.

The cause was argued before PRESCOTT, C.J., and HORNEY, MARBURY, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We are asked, for the first time, to interpret the 1960 amendment (1960, ch. 49, § 1) to Code Art. 66 1/2, § 154 (a) (1957 Cum. Supp. 1965). The Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Board (the Board) exhorts us to set aside the interpretation of the trial court. The facts, the question presented and the rationale of the decision are all set forth in the trial court's opinion, which follows:

"The above...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases