MILWAUKEE v. HORVATH


31 Wis.2d 490 (1966)

CITY OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent, v. HORVATH, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

July 1, 1966.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Dorothy E. Horvath of Whitefish Bay, pro se.

For the respondent there was a brief by John J. Fleming, city attorney, and Patrick J. Madden, assistant city attorney, and oral argument by William J. Lukacevich, assistant city attorney.


WILKIE, J.

The single issue presented on this appeal is whether Milwaukee Ordinance, sec. 101-321,2 which permits imprisonment upon failure to pay a fine, is constitutional.

It is well established that actions for violations of municipal ordinances, such as those in the instant case, are civil proceedings.3 Appellant contends that the disputed ordinance is repugnant to both sec. 1, art. XIII

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases