PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. We conclude that the trial court did not err in refusing to permit the appellants to compel the Government witness to state whether a person, prominently identified in the reported activities of appellants, but not called as a witness in the case, was a Government informer.
The judgment is, therefore...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.